Cruz Slams Allred on Gender Policy and Israel Stance in Fiery Texas Senate Debate

Gage Skidmore https://commons.wikimedia.org

Overview
In a heated debate between Senator Ted Cruz and his Democratic opponent Rep. Colin Allred, the two sparred over a variety of key issues ranging from women’s sports to national security. The debate marked an important moment in the upcoming Senate race, with both candidates presenting sharply contrasting views on gender issues, voter integrity, and foreign policy, particularly regarding the Israel-Hamas conflict. Cruz leveraged Allred’s voting record to position him as an advocate for radical policies, while Allred attempted to frame Cruz as out of touch with mainstream Texans.

Why It Matters
This race could determine the balance of power in the Senate, with significant consequences for legislative priorities impacting the nation.

Who It Impacts
Texans, particularly voters concerned with women’s rights, election security, and national defense, are most affected by the policy differences highlighted during the debate.


In a fiery exchange during a debate, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) took aim at Rep. Colin Allred (D-TX) on issues central to the 2024 Senate race, with particular emphasis on gender issues and the protection of women’s sports. Cruz, currently seeking a third term, has built a strong platform on preserving the integrity of women’s sports, attacking Allred’s voting record on the matter. According to Cruz, Allred has consistently voted in favor of legislation that undermines women’s and girls’ ability to compete fairly in sports, aligning himself with far-left positions.

Allred, a former NFL linebacker, dismissed Cruz’s focus on the issue as a desperate “Hail Mary” play by Republicans, saying he does not support boys competing in girls’ sports. However, Cruz directly addressed Allred’s voting record, pointing out that Allred had voted against the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2023.” This act, supported by Republicans, would have ensured that school athletic programs remain segregated by biological sex. Though the bill passed the House, it was ultimately blocked by Senate Democrats.

Cruz didn’t stop at women’s sports, choosing to broaden the attack to Allred’s stance on other key cultural issues. He brought up Allred’s support for the “Equality Act,” a bill that prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Though framed as an anti-discrimination bill, Cruz argued it serves to further blur the lines of gender and biological reality, creating legal pathways that ultimately harm women’s sports and the fair competition it was built on.

On foreign policy, Cruz emphasized another stark difference between the two candidates: Israel. Cruz positioned himself as an unwavering ally of Israel and its right to defend itself against threats from terrorist groups like Hamas. He criticized Allred for backing the Biden administration’s policies in the region, which he claims resulted in funding for Hamas through the administration’s dealings with Iran. According to Cruz, Allred’s votes have consistently enabled America’s adversaries, aligning with radical left-wing policies that undermine U.S. national security.

During the debate, Allred attempted to pivot to broader national issues, accusing Cruz of being a threat to democracy by pointing to Cruz’s objection to certifying the 2020 presidential election results. Allred highlighted his endorsement from former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY), using it as a way to suggest that Cruz’s hardline stance was too extreme even for some Republicans. However, Cruz deflected this attack, arguing that Allred’s opposition to basic voter security measures, such as requiring proof of citizenship to vote, is the real threat to democracy.

Voter integrity emerged as another major point of contention, with Cruz hammering home the importance of protecting the voting system. He pointed to the millions of illegal immigrants who have entered the country under the Biden administration, accusing Allred of facilitating policies that weaken border security and allow non-citizens to participate in U.S. elections. Cruz made it clear that this issue would not be ignored, framing Allred’s position as both dangerous and un-American.

The debate encapsulated the growing divide between Texas voters on critical issues like gender identity in sports, election security, and foreign policy. While Allred sought to distance himself from the far-left elements of his party, Cruz made it clear that his opponent’s voting record speaks louder than campaign rhetoric. At a time when the balance of power in the Senate could hinge on races like this one, Cruz’s aggressive defense of traditional values resonated with voters concerned about the direction of the country.