Make No Mistake, Obama Created The Division and Bitterness In America

Overview:

In a rally held in Wisconsin, former President Barack Obama expressed confusion over the division and bitterness in the country, though his own rhetoric throughout his presidency often contributed to these divisions. While Obama pointed to the toxicity in public discourse, his remarks and those of other Democratic leaders have sparked deep political and social polarization in the United States, leaving many citizens frustrated.

Why It Matters:

The rhetoric and actions of political leaders, particularly from the Democratic party, have significantly shaped the current political and social divisions that deeply affect American citizens.

Who It Impacts:

This ongoing polarization impacts everyday Americans, particularly those who feel marginalized or ignored by their political leaders, and it threatens the unity of the country.


At a rally in Wisconsin, former President Barack Obama remarked on the increasing division and bitterness in America’s political landscape. “I don’t understand how we got so toxic and just so divided and so bitter,” Obama stated. His comments reflected a sense of confusion over the country’s current state. However, the division he lamented is one he arguably contributed to during his presidency, with his past rhetoric and actions creating a more polarized nation.

During his time in office, Obama often engaged in rhetoric that inflamed tensions. In 2008, while running for president, he famously commented that rural Americans “cling to guns or religion” in response to their frustrations, a remark that alienated many who felt he was dismissive of their concerns. Later, in 2009, he remarked, “I don’t want to quell anger,” and acknowledged that Americans were right to be angry. This was part of a pattern where he urged his supporters to “argue” and “get in their face” when discussing politics with Republicans or independents, further exacerbating political divisions.

Obama’s presidency coincided with rising racial tensions as well. In 2016, a Rasmussen poll found that 60% of Americans felt that race relations had worsened under his leadership. During a memorial service for five Dallas police officers ambushed and killed by a shooter who targeted white officers, Obama acknowledged the deep roots of racism in American society. His acknowledgment of bias as an enduring problem in America, including within institutions like police departments, led to further contention, with some viewing it as an attack on law enforcement and others as a necessary recognition of injustice.

Obama’s rhetoric was often mirrored by other prominent Democrats. In 2016, Hillary Clinton made her infamous “basket of deplorables” comment, further alienating a significant portion of the electorate. This added to the growing sense of division, as voters who felt dismissed or ridiculed by the political establishment became more entrenched in their views. Obama himself used divisive language in referring to conservative Tea Party members as “teabaggers,” a derogatory term that only fueled the partisan divide.

While Obama now questions the causes of the bitterness and division in the country, his own role in shaping the current political landscape cannot be ignored. His calls for “hand-to-hand combat” with Republicans and his insistence on punishing “enemies” instead of seeking common ground have left a lasting impact on America’s political environment. The deep political and social divisions that exist today are not a mystery, but a consequence of years of inflammatory rhetoric from leaders across the political spectrum.

The political atmosphere today is a reflection of leadership that, rather than fostering unity, has often leaned into division. Obama’s comments in Wisconsin highlight a broader issue: when leaders fail to promote genuine dialogue and instead push for conflict, the bitterness and polarization that result can persist long after they leave office.