Vance Pokes Fun at Walz in Latest Podcast Episode, ‘You Don’t Have To Tell Anybody’

JD Vance | Source: commons.wikimedia.org

Overview: During a recent podcast appearance, Ohio Senator JD Vance took a lighthearted jab at Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, playfully suggesting that if Walz were to support the Republican ticket in the upcoming election, he’d happily keep it a secret. Vance, who is Donald Trump’s running mate, had just come off a well-received vice-presidential debate where many observed Walz agreeing with Vance’s points.

Why It Matters:
The exchange highlights the perceived momentum in the Trump-Vance campaign and underscores growing questions about the Democratic leadership’s ability to connect with voters.

Who It Impacts:
This will impact voters on both sides who are paying close attention to how political figures position themselves in the run-up to the election.


Ohio Senator JD Vance made headlines recently with his lighthearted teasing of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz during a podcast interview. Vance, who is the vice-presidential candidate on Donald Trump’s ticket, jokingly suggested that if Walz ever decided to cast his vote for the Republican ticket, he’d keep it quiet. The exchange occurred on the popular “Ruthless” podcast, where Vance discussed his recent vice-presidential debate performance, which has been widely praised by supporters and political analysts alike.

The moment came after one of the podcast hosts commented on Walz’s seemingly agreeable demeanor during the debate, where he was observed nodding along with several points made by Vance. “You had this huge week with an absolute butt-kicking of Tim Walz on the VP debate stage,” the host said. “I think you might have earned his vote that night. He was nodding along with almost everything you said.” Vance responded in good humor, stating, “I hope so, man. We’ll take every vote we can get,” and went further, “Tim, if you’re listening, you’re welcome to vote for us. You don’t have to tell anybody about it.”

The playful interaction has garnered attention online, with social media users chiming in on the exchange. Notably, prominent figures like Brigitte Gabriel and Donald Trump Jr. weighed in, suggesting that Walz’s body language during the debate hinted at his possible dissatisfaction with his own party’s leadership. “This was the moment Tim Walz decided he is voting for Donald Trump and JD Vance,” Gabriel wrote on X (formerly known as Twitter). Similarly, Trump Jr. posted, “The optics of Tim Walz just nodding along in agreement with literally everything @JDVance says is disastrous for Kamala Harris.”

Adding to the commentary was MSNBC’s Symone Sanders, who had worked for Vice President Kamala Harris. She expressed concern over Walz’s apparent agreement with Vance’s statements, posing the question, “I am just kinda like, well, if you agree so much with JD Vance, why should they vote for you?” This sentiment seems to capture the broader conversation about the Democratic Party’s messaging and unity heading into the election.

While the remarks were made in a playful tone, they reflect a larger issue within the political landscape: the difficulty some Democratic candidates face in maintaining a strong connection with voters, even within their own party. The perceived agreement between Walz and Vance on certain key issues during the debate raises questions about the current state of Democratic leadership and its ability to resonate with its base. At a time when elections can be determined by slim margins, moments like these are crucial.

For voters, the exchange underscores an ongoing political shift, where public figures are increasingly scrutinized not just for their policies, but for their ability to communicate effectively with the electorate. The upcoming election will likely hinge on these moments of connection—or lack thereof.