House Democrats Sidestep Questions on Flag Burning and Anti-American Chants


Several House Democrats, including Representatives Ayanna Pressley, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Katie Porter, avoided directly addressing questions about their stance on demonstrators who burned the American flag and chanted “death to America” during a pro-Palestinian protest in New York City. The incident, which blocked traffic on the Brooklyn Bridge, has sparked controversy and prompted inquiries from the media.

Why It Matters

The willingness to defend traditional American symbols and values is crucial for the preservation of national unity and pride.

Who It Impacts

This issue primarily impacts American citizens who hold the flag as a significant symbol of national identity and heritage, as well as those concerned with the expressions of anti-American sentiments.

During a recent series of confrontations in the nation’s capital, numerous House Democrats were approached by a reporter with pressing questions regarding a recent demonstration on the Brooklyn Bridge. The demonstration, which was ostensibly in support of Palestinian causes, took a contentious turn as participants burned American flags and voiced chants of “death to America.”

The reporter first directed these inquiries to Representative Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), who chose not to respond or acknowledge the questions about whether she supported such forms of protest. The issue of flag burning and anti-American slogans is highly sensitive and often seen as a litmus test for politicians regarding their patriotism and stance on free speech.

The same questions were later posed to Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who expressed uncertainty about the events. “I’m, I’m not privy to–, to, I haven’t seen these reports,” Ocasio-Cortez stated, suggesting a need to review the incidents herself before forming an opinion.

Representative Katie Porter (D-CA) was also questioned on her views regarding the protesters’ actions. As the reporter attempted to delve deeper, a staffer intervened, steering Porter away from the conversation and suggesting that any follow-up should be directed through formal channels. “If you’d like to follow up with us–,” the staffer began before being cut off by further pressing questions from the reporter.

These exchanges highlight a reluctance among some members of Congress to engage directly with questions about protests that involve acts widely viewed as anti-American. The refusal to condemn or even address these actions publicly has led to criticism of these lawmakers for their apparent evasion of sensitive political topics.

As the dialogue around patriotism and protest continues to evolve, the responses—or lack thereof—from elected officials serve as a barometer for the political and cultural currents shaping the United States today. The avoidance of direct answers on such divisive issues reflects the complex balance politicians attempt to maintain between supporting free expression and upholding traditional national values. This reticence has implications for how political figures align themselves in an increasingly polarized environment, where the symbolism of the American flag and the phrase “death to America” resonate deeply with many citizens. These are not just words or symbols, but touchstones of national identity that continue to define and divide the American political landscape.