Barr Slams Manhattan DA’s Case Against Trump as ‘Abomination’

Trump Source:


Former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr expressed strong confidence this week that the conviction in the Manhattan District Attorney’s criminal case against former President Donald Trump will be overturned, citing the absence of any actual crime.

Why It Matters

This issue is crucial for United States citizens as it reflects concerns about the integrity of the judicial process and potential political bias in legal proceedings.

Who It Impacts

This case impacts all Americans, particularly those concerned about fair legal practices and the potential misuse of the judicial system for political purposes.

In a recent interview, former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr voiced his belief that the conviction in the Manhattan District Attorney’s criminal case against former President Donald Trump is likely to be overturned. Barr emphasized that the case, from the outset, was fundamentally flawed, asserting that “there was no crime committed.”

“I said from the very start that this was an abomination,” Barr remarked, reflecting on the case’s progression. He expressed surprise that the prosecution proceeded despite the perceived lack of substance. “There was no crime there, and they never were able to really articulate it until after the defense rested its case. So I thought the whole thing was a travesty,” he continued. Barr criticized the manner in which the case was handled, highlighting the lack of focus on establishing the elements of the alleged crime and the evidence supporting it. “It was just assumed from the beginning that there was some kind of Federal Election Campaign violation, which there wasn’t,” he added.

Barr warned of the broader implications this case holds for political discourse and the overall health of the country. He described the case as detrimental to the fabric of American society, pointing out the potential long-term effects. “This case is going to be overruled because there are just multiple errors and violations of constitutional rights,” Barr predicted. He underscored the risks associated with the case’s outcome, particularly in the context of the upcoming election. “This will be eventually overruled after the election. But what happens if there’s a close election and Biden squeaks through and then the case is overruled? Half the country is going to feel that this was a stolen election,” Barr cautioned, suggesting that such a scenario could deepen national divisions.

Moreover, Barr criticized the gag order imposed on Trump by the judge, advocating for its immediate removal. He argued that Trump has every right to criticize those involved in the case, including the judge, prosecution, and witnesses. This stance underscores Barr’s belief in the fundamental rights of free speech and fair legal defense.

From Barr’s perspective, the Manhattan DA’s case represents a significant miscarriage of justice, one that poses serious risks to the nation’s political and social stability. His comments reflect a concern that the legal system may be misused for political ends, a view that resonates with many who fear the erosion of judicial impartiality.

The core issue at hand, as Barr sees it, is the integrity of the judicial process. He contends that the conviction lacks a solid legal foundation and that its eventual overturning is not just likely but necessary to restore faith in the legal system. The implications of this case extend beyond Trump, touching on the very principles of justice and fairness that are vital to the nation’s governance.