Biden’s Executive Order on Border Crisis Falls Short, Say Critics

Gage Skidmore


President Joe Biden signed an executive order addressing the border crisis, which critics argue is insufficient and primarily for show. The order temporarily halts asylum requests once daily encounters exceed 2,500, a move seen by many as too little, too late.

Why It Matters

This matter is critical because it addresses the ongoing border crisis, impacting national security and immigration control.

Who It Impacts

This impacts American citizens, especially those in border states, who are directly affected by the influx of illegal immigration.

President Joe Biden has signed a new executive order aimed at managing the overwhelming influx of illegal immigrants at the U.S. border, a crisis that has intensified over the past three and a half years. The order stipulates a temporary halt to asylum requests when the daily encounters exceed 2,500 individuals. This move, reported by NBC News, marks an attempt by the administration to curb the border surge, yet many argue it is insufficient.

Former Obama Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson had previously remarked that 1,000 daily apprehensions was a critical threshold that overwhelmed the system. Under Biden’s new directive, the cap is set at 2,500, a number that critics argue is still too high to manage effectively. A former U.S. law enforcement official told The Daily Wire that this executive order seems designed more to create headlines than to implement substantial change, suggesting that Mexican drug cartels would adapt by directing migrants to official ports of entry.

The administration released a fact sheet asserting that illegal immigrants entering the U.S. would be barred from receiving asylum, although it noted these measures are not permanent. This temporary nature has drawn criticism for not offering a lasting solution to the border issues. President Biden has often stated that his hands were tied regarding the border crisis, which has seen approximately 10 million illegal aliens enter the U.S. since he took office.

Republican lawmakers, including Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana, have condemned the executive order as mere “window dressing,” accusing Biden of failing to act sooner on the border crisis. Johnson emphasized that if the administration were genuinely concerned about the border, more decisive action would have been taken earlier. The White House maintains that Biden has been proactive, citing efforts to stop the flow of fentanyl into the country, despite rising overdose deaths linked to the drug.

Additionally, the administration touted a “historic bipartisan agreement” with Senate Democrats and Republicans as a significant reform to America’s immigration laws. However, this claim has faced skepticism, particularly from Republicans who argue that the law essentially legalizes illegal immigration. They believe that genuine reform requires stricter measures and better enforcement to truly address the crisis.

In essence, the executive order appears to be a stopgap measure rather than a comprehensive solution. It temporarily limits asylum claims but does not address the root causes or provide long-term fixes. Critics argue that the administration needs to take more robust actions to secure the border and enforce immigration laws effectively, rather than relying on temporary and reactionary measures.